[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3azgpqym2yaceheefnnj54rjjb5vz54haqayxmgbnjvb3rr3sj@aoiwdpfjo65s>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:51:32 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 6.11
On Jul 22 2024, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/07/2024 14:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 22/07/2024 14:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 16.07.2024 3:34 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >>> Linus,
> >>>
> >>> please pull from
> >>>
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git tags/for-linus-2024071601
> >>>
> >>> to receive HID subsystem updates for 6.11 merge window. Highlights:
> >>>
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> HID: bpf: Add support for the XP-PEN Deco Mini 4
> >>> HID: bpf: Add Huion Dial 2 bpf fixup
> >>> HID: bpf: Thrustmaster TCA Yoke Boeing joystick fix
> >>> HID: fix for amples in for-6.11/bpf
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> this commit broke b4 for everyone starting next-20240719, as it's
> >> an empty cover letter with b4 tracking information
> >
> > Uh, reminds me, I guess the same mistake of not seeing differences
> > between git pull and git am...
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/311c8b64-be13-4740-a659-3a14cf68774a@kernel.org/
> >
> > So just to recap:
> >
> > Please *do not merge your own trees* into kernel.org repos. Instead use
> > b4 shazam to pick up entire patchset, even if it is yours. b4 allows to
> > merge/apply also the cover letter, if this is your intention.
Oh s***. Sorry for that. I was not at home for the whole week and
completely missed that the branch was the developement one (I usually
use a different machine for applying branches and sending PR).
>
> Also, this was not present in next-20240717 and earlier. It was added in
> 20240719, so few days ago during merge window.
That's when I prepared my PR to Linus, but as I mentioned above I forgot
to reset that local branch.
>
> I think features should be in the next for some time before the merge
> window starts, not added to next the moment they are sent to upstream.
Yes, completely agree and that's a big mistake for me. I made a diff
with our for-next branch and didn't see anything. The only commit on top
of that messed up b4 cover letter is a67a1deb11d9 ("HID: samples: fix the
2 struct_ops definitions"), which was already in linux-next on July 8
as b35e0dc548aa ("HID: samples: fix the 2 struct_ops definitions"), so
almost a week before the opening of the MR.
I'm still trying to understand if I forgot to merge that for-6.11/bpf
branch into for-next at that time.
Is there anything we can do to rip off that commit from the tree and fix
b4?
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists