[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXGCsPvqBfL5hQDOARwfqasLRJ_eNPBbCngZ257HOe=xbWDkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:36:18 +0500
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
To: Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
guohanjun@...wei.com, gshan@...hat.com, miguel.luis@...cle.com,
catalin.marinas@....com,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: 6.11/regression/bisected - The commit c1385c1f0ba3 caused a new
possible recursive locking detected warning at computer boot.
Hi,
The first Fedora update to the 6.11 kernel
(kernel-debug-6.11.0-0.rc0.20240716gitd67978318827.2.fc41.x86_64)
brings a new warning: possible recursive locking detected.
The trace looks like:
ACPI: button: Power Button [PWRF]
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-0.rc0.20240716gitd67978318827.2.fc41.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
cpuhp/0/22 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffffb7f9cb40 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: static_key_enable+0x12/0x20
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffffb7f9cb40 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0xcd/0x6f0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by cpuhp/0/22:
#0: ffffffffb7f9cb40 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at:
cpuhp_thread_fun+0xcd/0x6f0
#1: ffffffffb7f9f2e0 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
cpuhp_thread_fun+0xcd/0x6f0
#2: ffffffffb7f1d650 (freq_invariance_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
init_freq_invariance_cppc+0xf4/0x1e0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted
6.11.0-0.rc0.20240716gitd67978318827.2.fc41.x86_64+debug #1
Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/ROG STRIX B650E-I GAMING WIFI,
BIOS 2611 04/07/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0xd0
__lock_acquire+0x27e3/0x5c70
? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
? cppc_get_perf_caps+0x64f/0xf60
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x540
? static_key_enable+0x12/0x20
? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
cpus_read_lock+0x40/0xe0
? static_key_enable+0x12/0x20
static_key_enable+0x12/0x20
freq_invariance_enable+0x13/0x40
init_freq_invariance_cppc+0x17e/0x1e0
? __pfx_init_freq_invariance_cppc+0x10/0x10
? acpi_cppc_processor_probe+0x1046/0x2300
acpi_cppc_processor_probe+0x11ae/0x2300
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4f/0x80
? __pfx_acpi_cppc_processor_probe+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_acpi_scan_drop_device+0x10/0x10
? acpi_fetch_acpi_dev+0x79/0xe0
? __pfx_acpi_fetch_acpi_dev+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x10/0x10
acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x114/0x330
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2c7/0xa40
? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
? cpuhp_thread_fun+0xcd/0x6f0
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x33a/0x6f0
? smpboot_thread_fn+0x56/0x930
smpboot_thread_fn+0x54b/0x930
? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x2d2/0x3a0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x60
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
Bisect is pointed to commit
commit c1385c1f0ba3b80bd12f26c440612175088c664c (HEAD)
Author: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Date: Wed May 29 14:34:28 2024 +0100
ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for
cold and hotplug
Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to
indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotplugged CPU ensured that
per CPU data was only set up the first time that a CPU was initialized.
This appears to be unnecessary as the paths can be combined by letting
the online logic also handle any CPUs online at the time of driver load.
Motivation for this change, beyond simplification, is that ARM64
virtual CPU HP uses the same code paths for hotplug and cold path in
acpi_processor.c so had no easy way to set the flag for hotplug only.
Removing this necessity will enable ARM64 vCPU HP to reuse the existing
code paths.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529133446.28446-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 7 +++----
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 43
++++++++++++-------------------------------
include/acpi/processor.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
And I can confirm that after reverting c1385c1f0ba3 the issue is gone.
I also attach here a full kernel log and build config.
My hardware specs: https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=c6de14f5b8
Jonathan, can you look into this, please?
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
Download attachment "6.11.0-0.rc0.20240716gitd67978318827.2.fc41.x86_64+debug.zip" of type "application/zip" (53007 bytes)
Download attachment ".config.zip" of type "application/zip" (66694 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists