lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a119ad47-11b7-42e5-a1e2-2706660c93d9@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:22:44 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, Alexandru Elisei
 <alexandru.elisei@....com>, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
 Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
 Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] arm64: rsi: Add RSI definitions

On 7/1/24 7:54 PM, Steven Price wrote:
> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> 
> The RMM (Realm Management Monitor) provides functionality that can be
> accessed by a realm guest through SMC (Realm Services Interface) calls.
> 
> The SMC definitions are based on DEN0137[1] version A-eac5.
> 
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0137/latest
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
>   * Drop invoke_rsi_fn_smc_with_res() function and call arm_smccc_smc()
>     directly instead.
>   * Rename header guard in rsi_smc.h to be consistent.
> Changes since v2:
>   * Rename rsi_get_version() to rsi_request_version()
>   * Fix size/alignment of struct realm_config
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h |  38 ++++++++
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_smc.h  | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 180 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_smc.h
> 

Some nits and questions like below.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..89e907f3af0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_RSI_CMDS_H
> +#define __ASM_RSI_CMDS_H
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/rsi_smc.h>
> +
> +static inline unsigned long rsi_request_version(unsigned long req,
> +						unsigned long *out_lower,
> +						unsigned long *out_higher)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_smc(SMC_RSI_ABI_VERSION, req, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +
> +	if (out_lower)
> +		*out_lower = res.a1;
> +	if (out_higher)
> +		*out_higher = res.a2;
> +
> +	return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long rsi_get_realm_config(struct realm_config *cfg)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_smc(SMC_RSI_REALM_CONFIG, virt_to_phys(cfg),
> +		      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +	return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif

#endif /* __ASM_RSI_CMDS_H */

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_smc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_smc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b3b3aff88f71
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_smc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_RSI_SMC_H_
> +#define __ASM_RSI_SMC_H_
> +
> +/*
> + * This file describes the Realm Services Interface (RSI) Application Binary
> + * Interface (ABI) for SMC calls made from within the Realm to the RMM and
> + * serviced by the RMM.
> + */
> +
> +#define SMC_RSI_CALL_BASE		0xC4000000
> +
> +/*
> + * The major version number of the RSI implementation.  Increase this whenever
> + * the binary format or semantics of the SMC calls change.
> + */
> +#define RSI_ABI_VERSION_MAJOR		1
> +
> +/*
> + * The minor version number of the RSI implementation.  Increase this when
> + * a bug is fixed, or a feature is added without breaking binary compatibility.
> + */
> +#define RSI_ABI_VERSION_MINOR		0
> +
> +#define RSI_ABI_VERSION			((RSI_ABI_VERSION_MAJOR << 16) | \
> +					 RSI_ABI_VERSION_MINOR)
> +
> +#define RSI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MAJOR(_version) ((_version) >> 16)
> +#define RSI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MINOR(_version) ((_version) & 0xFFFF)
> +
> +#define RSI_SUCCESS			0
> +#define RSI_ERROR_INPUT			1
> +#define RSI_ERROR_STATE			2
> +#define RSI_INCOMPLETE			3
> +

I think these return values are copied from tf-rmm/lib/smc/include/smc-rsi.h, but
UL() prefix has been missed. It's still probably worthy to have it to indicate the
width of the return values. Besides, it seems that RSI_ERROR_COUNT is also missed
here.


> +#define SMC_RSI_FID(_x)			(SMC_RSI_CALL_BASE + (_x))
> +
> +#define SMC_RSI_ABI_VERSION			SMC_RSI_FID(0x190)
> +
> +/*
> + * arg1 == Challenge value, bytes:  0 -  7
> + * arg2 == Challenge value, bytes:  7 - 15
> + * arg3 == Challenge value, bytes: 16 - 23
> + * arg4 == Challenge value, bytes: 24 - 31
> + * arg5 == Challenge value, bytes: 32 - 39
> + * arg6 == Challenge value, bytes: 40 - 47
> + * arg7 == Challenge value, bytes: 48 - 55
> + * arg8 == Challenge value, bytes: 56 - 63
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + * ret1 == Upper bound of token size in bytes
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_ATTESTATION_TOKEN_INIT		SMC_RSI_FID(0x194)
> +

In tf-rmm/lib/smc/include/smc-rsi.h, it is SMC_RSI_ATTEST_TOKEN_INIT instead
of SMC_RSI_ATTESTATION_TOKEN_INIT. The short description for all SMC calls have
been dropped and I think they're worthy to be kept. At least, it helps readers
to understand what the SMC call does. For this particular SMC call, the short
description is something like below:

/*
  * Initialize the operation to retrieve an attestation token.
  * :
  */

> +/*
> + * arg1 == The IPA of token buffer
> + * arg2 == Offset within the granule of the token buffer
> + * arg3 == Size of the granule buffer
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + * ret1 == Length of token bytes copied to the granule buffer
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_ATTESTATION_TOKEN_CONTINUE	SMC_RSI_FID(0x195)
> +

SMC_RSI_ATTEST_TOKEN_CONTINUE as defined in tf-rmm.

> +/*
> + * arg1  == Index, which measurements slot to extend
> + * arg2  == Size of realm measurement in bytes, max 64 bytes
> + * arg3  == Measurement value, bytes:  0 -  7
> + * arg4  == Measurement value, bytes:  7 - 15
> + * arg5  == Measurement value, bytes: 16 - 23
> + * arg6  == Measurement value, bytes: 24 - 31
> + * arg7  == Measurement value, bytes: 32 - 39
> + * arg8  == Measurement value, bytes: 40 - 47
> + * arg9  == Measurement value, bytes: 48 - 55
> + * arg10 == Measurement value, bytes: 56 - 63
> + * ret0  == Status / error
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_MEASUREMENT_EXTEND		SMC_RSI_FID(0x193)
> +
> +/*
> + * arg1 == Index, which measurements slot to read
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + * ret1 == Measurement value, bytes:  0 -  7
> + * ret2 == Measurement value, bytes:  7 - 15
> + * ret3 == Measurement value, bytes: 16 - 23
> + * ret4 == Measurement value, bytes: 24 - 31
> + * ret5 == Measurement value, bytes: 32 - 39
> + * ret6 == Measurement value, bytes: 40 - 47
> + * ret7 == Measurement value, bytes: 48 - 55
> + * ret8 == Measurement value, bytes: 56 - 63
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_MEASUREMENT_READ		SMC_RSI_FID(0x192)
> +

The order of these SMC call definitions are sorted based on their corresponding
function IDs. For example, SMC_RSI_MEASUREMENT_READ would be appearing prior to
SMC_RSI_MEASUREMENT_EXTEND.

> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +struct realm_config {
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			unsigned long ipa_bits; /* Width of IPA in bits */
> +			unsigned long hash_algo; /* Hash algorithm */
> +		};
> +		u8 pad[0x1000];
> +	};
> +} __aligned(0x1000);
> +

This describes the argument to SMC call RSI_REALM_CONFIG and its address needs to
be aligned to 0x1000. Otherwise, RSI_ERROR_INPUT is returned. This maybe worthy
a comment to explain it why we need 0x1000 alignment here.

It seems the only 4KB page size (GRANULE_SIZE) is supported by tf-rmm at present.
The fixed alignment (0x1000) becomes broken if tf-rmm is extended to support
64KB in future. Maybe tf-rmm was designed to work with the minimal page size (4KB).

> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +/*
> + * arg1 == struct realm_config addr
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_REALM_CONFIG			SMC_RSI_FID(0x196)
> +
> +/*
> + * arg1 == Base IPA address of target region
> + * arg2 == Top of the region
> + * arg3 == RIPAS value
> + * arg4 == flags
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + * ret1 == Top of modified IPA range
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_IPA_STATE_SET			SMC_RSI_FID(0x197)
> +
> +#define RSI_NO_CHANGE_DESTROYED			0
> +#define RSI_CHANGE_DESTROYED			1
> +
> +/*
> + * arg1 == IPA of target page
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + * ret1 == RIPAS value
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_IPA_STATE_GET			SMC_RSI_FID(0x198)
> +
> +/*
> + * arg1 == IPA of host call structure
> + * ret0 == Status / error
> + */
> +#define SMC_RSI_HOST_CALL			SMC_RSI_FID(0x199)
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_RSI_SMC_H_ */

Thanks,
Gavin


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ