linux-kernel - Re: [alexshi:mmunstable2] 934c05f8c5: BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bd36db00-5464-4eb5-adb1-0ddfd3be1cfa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:23:00 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [alexshi:mmunstable2] 934c05f8c5:
 BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for_address



On 7/23/24 11:22 AM, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Alex,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:58:25AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> On 7/23/24 9:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> hi, Alex Shi,
>>>
>>> we noticed there is a mmunstable3 branch now, but there is no same title patch
>>> there. not sure if this report is still useful, below report just FYI.
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your testing and founding on my unreleased code branch!
>> The problem should be resolved on my latest code yesterday.
>> But multiple archs maybe still are fragile in the branch. Are there bootable in virtual machine, like arm, s390, etc?
> we did boot test in vm, but only for x86_64 or i386.
> 
> you may notice we also send another report
> "[alexshi:mmunstable3] [mm/memory]  f6ba7ce983: kernel_BUG_at_mm/page_alloc.c"

this problem was fixed too. Anyway thanks a lot notice me of this.

> 
> for both commit, we made some further check and cofirmed they cannot boot
> successfully on both vm/bm, again, we only test x86_64/i386 for now.

Thanks a lot for the info!

Alex