[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpo=mXS43Mhp15Z6fRtLc+__+PmQ7yrOaOQKW-_R1sgbTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:14:31 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
Cc: srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_bkumar@...cinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_chennak@...cinc.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, arnd@...db.de, stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] misc: fastrpc: Increase unsigned PD initmem size
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 07:36, Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/22/2024 2:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 01:32:00PM GMT, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> >> For unsigned PD offloading requirement, additional memory is required
> >> because of additional static heap initialization. Without this
> >> additional memory, PD initialization would fail. Increase the initmem
> >> size by 2MB for unsigned PD initmem buffer allocation. Any additional
> >> memory sent to DSP during PD init is used as the PD heap.
> > From the previous commit message I had the feeling that DSP can request
> > more memory if required. Currently you are stating that PD init would
> > fail if it doesn't have enough mem.
>
> DSP PD can request for memory only for PD heap and that too once the PD
> initialization is complete.
This should be a part of the (previous?) commit message. Also what is
the difference between static heap vs PD heap?
>
> >
> >> Fixes: 7f1f481263c3 ("misc: fastrpc: check before loading process to the DSP")
> >> Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 8 ++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists