[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d9ea6fd-03f4-4fd5-8407-2201e8ba5010@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:14:44 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] memory tiering: introduce folio_has_cpupid() check
>
> The static version of folio_has_cpupid() is defined in include/linux/mm.h
> if !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING but you define the function in memory-tiers.c
> unconditionally, a file that is compiled predicated on CONFIG_NUMA.
>
> So a config with !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING but CONFIG_NUMA set results in a
> compilation error (I just hit it this morning in mm-unstable).
>
> A minimal fix for this is to wrap the declaration in:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> ...
> #endif
>
> I've tried this locally and it resolves the issue.
Agreed, with that
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists