linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] scsi discard fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DA41FB3C-D3DF-4219-B027-5E5A69D92F07@smartx.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:24:36 +0800
From: Li Feng <fengli@...rtx.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
 Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] scsi discard fix

Hi Jens and Martin,

Thank you. 
I was worried that you were too busy and forgot about these two patches.

> 2024年7月23日 08:37，Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> 写道：
> 
> On 7/22/24 5:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> 
>> Jens,
>> 
>>> They can, but is there some dependency that means they should go
>>> through the block tree? Would seem more logical that Martin picked
>>> them up.
>> 
>> I'll get to them. Busy with a couple of hardware-related regressions
>> right now.
> 
> All good, just wanted to ensure they weren't waiting on me, as the
> cover letter seemed to indicate.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 
>