[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zp_Ozo_Iyu1sgL9h@tassilo>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:39:58 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf script: Fix for `perf script +F metric` with
leader sampling
> Yeah I suppose it's strictly better now without the segfault. Could you pull
> in the test and update it to add -a? At least then that behavior will be
> locked down and we can extend it later without -a.
Ian's patch really implements completely new functionality (supporting
metrics over multiple groups). It isn't a regression fix, but completely
redesigns the old "single group" feature.
> I also tested Andi's V5 and still got the segfault.
Yes the earlier versions worked, but they broke perf stat report.
I think the right short term fix is to use V3 or so, but with a
check that perf stat report isn't used.
Then perhaps the new functionality of multiple groups can be considered
over it.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists