linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests: mm: add s390 to ARCH check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240724140641.a3b44292494b308d3689b51d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:06:41 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
 paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: mm: add s390 to ARCH check

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:09:55 -0600 Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com> wrote:

> When compiling with ARCH already set, the s390x ARCH is actually s390.
> Add s390 to the ARCH check list, so we can properly build selftests for
> s390.
> 

Unclear what "properly" means.  I assume it partially works?

I'm assuming that properly building selftests for s390 is desirable, so
a cc:stable is needed?  Is there a suitable Fixes:?

I'd really prefer not to assume!  A more detailed changelog which
describes the problem would be helpful, thanks.