[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202407241429.B78BBA419@keescook>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:29:44 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: treewide: constify the ctl_table argument of
proc_handlers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:05:09PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:51:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:09:00PM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> > > Adapt the proc_hander function signature to make it clear that handlers
> > > are not supposed to modify their ctl_table argument.
> > >
> > > This is also a prerequisite to moving the static ctl_table structs into
> > > read-only data.
> > >
> > > The patch was mostly generated by coccinelle with the following script:
> > >
> > > @@
> > > identifier func, ctl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > int func(
> > > - struct ctl_table *ctl,
> > > + const struct ctl_table *ctl,
> > > int write, void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> > > { ... }
> > >
> > > In addition to the scripted changes some other changes are done:
> > >
> > > * The "typedef proc_handler" in include/linux/sysctl.h is changed to use
> > > the "const ctl_table".
> > >
> > > * The prototypes of non-static handlers in header-files are adapted
> > > to match the changes of their respective definitions.
> > >
> > > * kernel/watchdog.c: proc_watchdog_common()
> > > This is called from a proc_handler itself and is als calling back
> > > into another proc_handler, making it necessary to change it as part
> > > of the proc_handler migration.
> > >
> > > No functional change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Wei?schuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> >
> > This looks good! I'll be glad to see these all be read-only. :)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
> Since the patch and the coccinelle script changed, I removed your
> Reviewed-by tag from the commit that I sent. Just FYI.
Totally reasonable. And the PR looks good. We'll see what Linus thinks! :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists