[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e51f3b91-690d-4b72-9841-75a61684777d@proton.me>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:51:57 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Rust: support `CPU_MITIGATIONS` and enable `objtool`
On 24.07.24 18:14, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an updated series to the CPU mitigations support for Rust. It
> also has the patch to enable `objtool`, so that we can start running it
> for Rust.
>
> It would be nice to get this applied soon, so that we start being
> warning-free (since we already get warnings under IBT builds via
> `vmlinux.o`). I am happy to take it through the Rust tree if the x86 and
> objtool maintainers give an Acked-by, or through any of the other trees,
> as you prefer. Otherwise, I think at this point we would need to make
> Rust exclusive to the mitigations, which isn't great.
>
> With this series, again, x86_64 is warning-free with `objtool` enabled. I
> tested `-O2`/`-Os` and the Rust versions we support under `-O2` (mainly
> for the `noreturn` patch, which uses heuristics), as well as IBT vs. no
> IBT (i.e. running on individual object files vs. in `vmlinux`). I also
> did an arm64 build.
>
> Testing is very welcome for this one!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
> v2:
> - Add patch to enable `objtool` for Rust.
>
> - Add patch to list `noreturn` Rust functions (via heuristics) to avoid
> warnings related to that.
>
> - Make the `RETHUNK` patch not an RFC since the Rust compiler has
> support for
> it now.
>
> - Update the names of the migitation config symbols, given the changes
> at e.g.
> commit 7b75782ffd82 ("x86/bugs: Rename CONFIG_MITIGATION_SLS =>
> CONFIG_MITIGATION_SLS").
>
> Miguel Ojeda (6):
> rust: module: add static pointer to `{init,cleanup}_module()`
> x86/rust: support MITIGATION_RETPOLINE
> x86/rust: support MITIGATION_RETHUNK
> x86/rust: support MITIGATION_SLS
> objtool: list `noreturn` Rust functions
> objtool/kbuild/rust: enable objtool for Rust
>
> arch/x86/Makefile | 7 ++++++-
> rust/Makefile | 22 ++++++++++++--------
> rust/macros/module.rs | 12 +++++++++++
> scripts/Makefile.build | 9 +++++++--
> scripts/generate_rust_target.rs | 15 ++++++++++++++
> tools/objtool/check.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tools/objtool/noreturns.h | 2 ++
> 7 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: b1263411112305acf2af728728591465becb45b0
> --
> 2.45.2
>
I tested this series with a config that produces the objtool warnings on
b126341 and it worked flawlessly. I also tried `-O2` and `-Os`:
Tested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists