[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da41a162-9f6d-4607-9055-ffc21fe1771e@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:20:17 +0800
From: Youling Tang <youling.tang@...ux.dev>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...sol.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, tytso@....edu,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Youling Tang <tangyouling@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: Add module_subinit{_noexit} and
module_subeixt helper macros
Hi, Mika
On 23/07/2024 17:58, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> On 7/23/24 11:32, Youling Tang wrote:
>> From: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...inos.cn>
>>
>> In theory init/exit should match their sequence, thus normally they should
>> look like this:
>> -------------------------+------------------------
>> init_A(); |
>> init_B(); |
>> init_C(); |
>> | exit_C();
>> | exit_B();
>> | exit_A();
>>
>> Providing module_subinit{_noexit} and module_subeixt helps macros ensure
>> that modules init/exit match their order, while also simplifying the code.
>>
>> The three macros are defined as follows:
>> - module_subinit(initfn, exitfn,rollback)
>> - module_subinit_noexit(initfn, rollback)
>> - module_subexit(rollback)
>>
>> `initfn` is the initialization function and `exitfn` is the corresponding
>> exit function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...inos.cn>
>> ---
>> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 5 +++
>> include/linux/init.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> include/linux/module.h | 22 +++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>> index 677315e51e54..48ccac7c6448 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>> @@ -927,6 +927,10 @@
>> INIT_CALLS_LEVEL(7) \
>> __initcall_end = .;
>>
>> +#define SUBINIT_CALL \
>> + *(.subinitcall.init) \
>> + *(.subexitcall.exit)
>> +
>> #define CON_INITCALL \
>> BOUNDED_SECTION_POST_LABEL(.con_initcall.init, __con_initcall, _start, _end)
>>
>> @@ -1155,6 +1159,7 @@
>> INIT_DATA \
>> INIT_SETUP(initsetup_align) \
>> INIT_CALLS \
>> + SUBINIT_CALL \
>> CON_INITCALL \
>> INIT_RAM_FS \
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/init.h b/include/linux/init.h
>> index ee1309473bc6..e8689ff2cb6c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/init.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/init.h
>> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@
>> #define __exitdata __section(".exit.data")
>> #define __exit_call __used __section(".exitcall.exit")
>>
>> +#define __subinit_call __used __section(".subinitcall.init")
>> +#define __subexit_call __used __section(".subexitcall.exit")
>> +
>> /*
>> * modpost check for section mismatches during the kernel build.
>> * A section mismatch happens when there are references from a
>> @@ -115,6 +118,9 @@
>> typedef int (*initcall_t)(void);
>> typedef void (*exitcall_t)(void);
>>
>> +typedef int (*subinitcall_t)(void);
>> +typedef void (*subexitcall_t)(void);
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS
>> typedef int initcall_entry_t;
>>
>> @@ -183,7 +189,61 @@ extern struct module __this_module;
>> #endif
>>
>> #endif
>> -
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +struct subexitcall_rollback {
>> + /*
>> + * Records the address of the first sub-initialization function in the
>> + * ".subexitcall.exit" section
>> + */
>> + unsigned long first_addr;
>> + int ncalls;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline void __subexitcall_rollback(struct subexitcall_rollback *r)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long addr = r->first_addr - sizeof(r->first_addr) * (r->ncalls - 1);
>> +
>> + for (; r->ncalls--; addr += sizeof(r->first_addr)) {
>> + unsigned long *tmp = (void *)addr;
>> + subexitcall_t fn = (subexitcall_t)*tmp;
>> + fn();
>> + }
>> +}
> How does this guarantee the exit calls match sequence? Are you assuming
> linker puts exit functions in reverse order?
Take btrfs for example:
Initialize the function sequentially in init_btrfs_fs() using
module_subinit{_noexit}, storing the corresponding function addresses
in the specified ".subinitcall.init" and ".subexitcall.exit" sections.
Using gcc to compile btrfs to.ko, the view section contains the following:
```
$ objdump -d -j ".subinitcall.init" fs/btrfs/super.o
fs/btrfs/super.o: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .subinitcall.init:
0000000000000000 <__subinitcall_register_btrfs.0>:
...
0000000000000008 <__subinitcall_btrfs_run_sanity_tests.2>:
...
0000000000000010 <__subinitcall_btrfs_print_mod_info.3>:
...
0000000000000018 <__subinitcall_btrfs_interface_init.4>:
...
0000000000000020 <__subinitcall_btrfs_prelim_ref_init.6>:
...
0000000000000028 <__subinitcall_btrfs_delayed_ref_init.8>:
...
0000000000000030 <__subinitcall_btrfs_auto_defrag_init.10>:
...
0000000000000038 <__subinitcall_btrfs_delayed_inode_init.12>:
...
0000000000000040 <__subinitcall_ordered_data_init.14>:
...
0000000000000048 <__subinitcall_extent_map_init.16>:
...
0000000000000050 <__subinitcall_btrfs_bioset_init.18>:
...
0000000000000058 <__subinitcall_extent_buffer_init_cachep.20>:
...
0000000000000060 <__subinitcall_extent_state_init_cachep.22>:
...
0000000000000068 <__subinitcall_btrfs_free_space_init.24>:
...
0000000000000070 <__subinitcall_btrfs_ctree_init.26>:
...
0000000000000078 <__subinitcall_btrfs_transaction_init.28>:
...
0000000000000080 <__subinitcall_btrfs_init_dio.30>:
...
0000000000000088 <__subinitcall_btrfs_init_cachep.32>:
...
0000000000000090 <__subinitcall_btrfs_init_compress.34>:
...
0000000000000098 <__subinitcall_btrfs_init_sysfs.36>:
...
00000000000000a0 <__subinitcall_btrfs_props_init.38>:
...
```
```
$ objdump -d -j ".subexitcall.exit" fs/btrfs/super.o
fs/btrfs/super.o: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .subexitcall.exit:
0000000000000000 <__subexitcall_unregister_btrfs.1>:
...
0000000000000008 <__subexitcall_btrfs_interface_exit.5>:
...
0000000000000010 <__subexitcall_btrfs_prelim_ref_exit.7>:
...
0000000000000018 <__subexitcall_btrfs_delayed_ref_exit.9>:
...
0000000000000020 <__subexitcall_btrfs_auto_defrag_exit.11>:
...
0000000000000028 <__subexitcall_btrfs_delayed_inode_exit.13>:
...
0000000000000030 <__subexitcall_ordered_data_exit.15>:
...
0000000000000038 <__subexitcall_extent_map_exit.17>:
...
0000000000000040 <__subexitcall_btrfs_bioset_exit.19>:
...
0000000000000048 <__subexitcall_extent_buffer_free_cachep.21>:
...
0000000000000050 <__subexitcall_extent_state_free_cachep.23>:
...
0000000000000058 <__subexitcall_btrfs_free_space_exit.25>:
...
0000000000000060 <__subexitcall_btrfs_ctree_exit.27>:
...
0000000000000068 <__subexitcall_btrfs_transaction_exit.29>:
...
0000000000000070 <__subexitcall_btrfs_destroy_dio.31>:
...
0000000000000078 <__subexitcall_btrfs_destroy_cachep.33>:
...
0000000000000080 <__subexitcall_btrfs_exit_compress.35>:
...
0000000000000088 <__subexitcall_btrfs_exit_sysfs.37>:
...
```
From the above, we can see that the compiler stores the init/exit function
in reverse order.
Thanks,
Youling.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists