[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D2XUESJWJNIY.3HP9IDB0NKFYI@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:35:46 +0000
From: Heghedus Razvan <heghedus.razvan@...tonmail.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: daniel.almeida@...labora.com, faith.ekstrand@...labora.com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com, lina@...hilina.net, mcanal@...lia.com, zhiw@...dia.com, acurrid@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, airlied@...hat.com, ajanulgu@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/23] rust: alloc: implement `collect` for `IntoIter`
On Tue Jul 23, 2024 at 9:10 PM EEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Currently, we can't implement `FromIterator`. There are a couple of
> issues with this trait in the kernel, namely:
>
> - Rust's specialization feature is unstable. This prevents us to
> optimze for the special case where `I::IntoIter` equals `Vec`'s
> `IntoIter` type.
> - We also can't use `I::IntoIter`'s type ID either to work around this,
> since `FromIterator` doesn't require this type to be `'static`.
> - `FromIterator::from_iter` does return `Self` instead of
> `Result<Self, AllocError>`, hence we can't properly handle allocation
> failures.
> - Neither `Iterator::collect` nor `FromIterator::from_iter` can handle
> additional allocation flags.
Well that's a shame, so I guess collecting a Filter or Map is not possible.
>
> Instead, provide `IntoIter::collect`, such that we can at least convert
> `IntoIter` into a `Vec` again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
> ---
> rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> index fbfb755b252d..5c317931e14c 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>
> //! Implementation of [`Vec`].
>
> -use super::{AllocError, Allocator, Flags};
> +use super::{flags::*, AllocError, Allocator, Flags};
> use crate::types::Unique;
> use core::{
> fmt,
> @@ -633,6 +633,84 @@ impl<T, A> IntoIter<T, A>
> fn as_raw_mut_slice(&mut self) -> *mut [T] {
> ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut(self.ptr, self.len)
> }
> +
> + fn into_raw_parts(self) -> (*mut T, NonNull<T>, usize, usize) {
> + let me = ManuallyDrop::new(self);
> + let ptr = me.ptr;
> + let buf = me.buf;
> + let len = me.len;
> + let cap = me.cap;
> + (ptr, buf, len, cap)
> + }
> +
> + /// Same as `Iterator::collect` but specialized for `Vec`'s `IntoIter`.
> + ///
> + /// Currently, we can't implement `FromIterator`. There are a couple of issues with this trait
> + /// in the kernel, namely:
> + ///
> + /// - Rust's specialization feature is unstable. This prevents us to optimze for the special
> + /// case where `I::IntoIter` equals `Vec`'s `IntoIter` type.
> + /// - We also can't use `I::IntoIter`'s type ID either to work around this, since `FromIterator`
> + /// doesn't require this type to be `'static`.
> + /// - `FromIterator::from_iter` does return `Self` instead of `Result<Self, AllocError>`, hence
> + /// we can't properly handle allocation failures.
> + /// - Neither `Iterator::collect` nor `FromIterator::from_iter` can handle additional allocation
> + /// flags.
> + ///
> + /// Instead, provide `IntoIter::collect`, such that we can at least convert a `IntoIter` into a
> + /// `Vec` again.
> + ///
> + /// Note that `IntoIter::collect` doesn't require `Flags`, since it re-uses the existing backing
> + /// buffer. However, this backing buffer may be shrunk to the actual count of elements.
> + ///
> + /// # Examples
> + ///
> + /// ```
> + /// let v = kernel::kvec![1, 2, 3]?;
> + /// let mut it = v.into_iter();
> + ///
> + /// assert_eq!(it.next(), Some(1));
> + ///
> + /// let v = it.collect();
> + /// assert_eq!(v, [2, 3]);
> + ///
> + /// # Ok::<(), Error>(())
> + /// ```
> + pub fn collect(self) -> Vec<T, A> {
> + let (mut ptr, buf, len, mut cap) = self.into_raw_parts();
> + let has_advanced = ptr != buf.as_ptr();
> +
> + if has_advanced {
> + // SAFETY: Copy the contents we have advanced to at the beginning of the buffer.
> + // `ptr` is guaranteed to be between `buf` and `buf.add(cap)` and `ptr.add(len)` is
> + // guaranteed to be smaller than `buf.add(cap)`.
> + unsafe { ptr::copy(ptr, buf.as_ptr(), len) };
> + ptr = buf.as_ptr();
> + }
> +
> + // This can never fail, `len` is guaranteed to be smaller than `cap`.
> + let layout = core::alloc::Layout::array::<T>(len).unwrap();
> +
> + // SAFETY: `buf` points to the start of the backing buffer and `len` is guaranteed to be
> + // smaller than `cap`. Depending on `alloc` this operation may shrink the buffer or leaves
> + // it as it is.
> + ptr = match unsafe { A::realloc(Some(buf.cast()), layout, GFP_KERNEL) } {
Here you use `GFP_KERNEL` flag directly. Shouldn't this be an argument of `collect` function?
> + // If we fail to shrink, which likely can't even happen, continue with the existing
> + // buffer.
> + Err(_) => ptr,
> + Ok(ptr) => {
> + cap = len;
> + ptr.as_ptr().cast()
> + }
> + };
> +
> + // SAFETY: If the iterator has been advanced, the advanced elements have been copied to
> + // the beginning of the buffer and `len` has been adjusted accordingly. `ptr` is guaranteed
> + // to point to the start of the backing buffer. `cap` is either the original capacity or,
> + // after shrinking the buffer, equal to `len`. `alloc` is guaranteed to be unchanged since
> + // `into_iter` has been called on the original `Vec`.
> + unsafe { Vec::from_raw_parts(ptr, len, cap) }
> + }
> }
>
> impl<T, A> Iterator for IntoIter<T, A>
> --
> 2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists