[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c0b08f9-7c0b-4452-bbd2-a7e23bbcf572@web.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:38:58 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Eduard Zingerman
<eddyz87@...il.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tools/bpf: Fix the wrong format specifier
> The format specifier of "unsigned int" in printf() should be "%u", not
> "%d".
Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
…
> ---
> Changes:
…
> v3:fix compile warninf
V3:
Fix a compilation warning?
…
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ void dump_xlated_plain(struct dump_data *dd, void *buf, unsigned int len,
…
> - unsigned int i;
> + int i;
Please do not change the data type for the variable
if you would like to adjust a subsequent format string.
…
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ void dump_xlated_for_graph(struct dump_data *dd, void *buf_start, void *buf_end,
> }
> }
>
> - printf("%d: ", insn_off);
> + printf("%u: ", insn_off);
> print_bpf_insn(&cbs, cur, true);
…
How do you think about to care more also for the return value from such a function call?
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ERR33-C.+Detect+and+handle+standard+library+errors
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists