[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240724144422.GA13505@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:44:22 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@....com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [filemap] 9aac777aaf:
phoronix-test-suite.iozone.1MB.512MB.WritePerformance.mb_s -14.0%
regression
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed a -14.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.iozone.1MB.512MB.WritePerformance.mb_s on:
>
>
> commit: 9aac777aaf9459786bc8463e6cbfc7e7e1abd1f9 ("filemap: Convert generic_perform_write() to support large folios")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
This is really weird as it shouldn't make a different for file systems
not using large folios. What file system is this test run with?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists