lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqEXC7NVStjPA9os@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:00:27 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: zhang warden <zhangwarden@...il.com>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Add using attribute to klp_func for using
 func show

On Sat 2024-07-20 13:56:56, zhang warden wrote:
> 
> > is this always correct though? See the logic in klp_ftrace_handler(). If 
> > there is a transition running, it is a little bit more complicated.
> > 
> > Miroslav
> 
> Hi! Miroslav.
> 
> In reality, we often encounter such situation that serval patch in one system, some patch make changes to one same function A. This make us confused that we don't know which version of function A is now using. 
> 
> In my view, this "using" state show the function version that is now enabling. Even if there is a transition running, the end state of one task will finally use patchN's version.
> 
> If we see the attribute "using" is 1, it mean that livepatch will use this function to work but seem to be not all task running this version because the "transition" flag of this patch is "1". We can be told from "transition" that if all threads have completed synchronization.
>
> So, the main function of this attribute is to enable user space find out which version of the patched function is running now (or will use after transition completed)in the system.

The value is useless when the transition is in progress.
You simply do not know which variant is used in this case.

Which brings the question how exactly you use the value.
Could you please provide an example of decision which you make based
on the value?

If we agree that it makes sense then we should make it 3-state
where the meaning of values would be:

   -1: unknown (transition in progress)
   0: unused
   1: used

Best Regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ