linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: imu: SMI240: add bosch,smi240.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ceef4cf-c82e-4296-875e-aafed50ce10a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:48:40 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Shen Jianping (ME-SE/EAD2)" <Jianping.Shen@...bosch.com>,
 "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>, "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "dima.fedrau@...il.com" <dima.fedrau@...il.com>,
 "marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com" <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>,
 "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Lorenz Christian (ME-SE/EAD2)" <Christian.Lorenz3@...bosch.com>,
 "Frauendorf Ulrike (ME/PJ-SW3)" <Ulrike.Frauendorf@...bosch.com>,
 "Dolde Kai (ME-SE/PAE-A3)" <Kai.Dolde@...bosch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: imu: SMI240: add bosch,smi240.yaml

On 24/07/2024 16:19, Shen Jianping (ME-SE/EAD2) wrote:
> Anyway, please send bindings with driver in the same patchset.

Fix your quotes. That's my message, not yours.

> 
> -> It's fine for us. Nevertheless according to the Devicetree (DT) binding submitting rules 1.1
> 
> " The Documentation/ and include/dt-bindings/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch." See -> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters

And what did I say? Patch or patchset?

> 
> Shall we still put the binding and driver in the same patch ?

I did not write "patch".

Please respond inline, instead of top-posting, because it makes your
emails hard to follow.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc7/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L340

Best regards,
Krzysztof