[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240724170544.11372-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:05:44 -0700
From: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
CC: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: prevent possible int overflow in dir_block_index()
The result of multiplication between values derived from functions
dir_buckets() and bucket_blocks() *could* technically reach
2^30 * 2^2 = 2^32.
While unlikely to happen, it is prudent to ensure that it will not
lead to integer overflow. Thus, use mul_u32_u32() as it's more
appropriate to mitigate the issue.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static
analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: 3843154598a0 ("f2fs: introduce large directory support")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>
---
fs/f2fs/dir.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
index cbd7a5e96a37..14900ca8a9ff 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static unsigned long dir_block_index(unsigned int level,
unsigned long bidx = 0;
for (i = 0; i < level; i++)
- bidx += dir_buckets(i, dir_level) * bucket_blocks(i);
+ bidx += mul_u32_u32(dir_buckets(i, dir_level),
+ bucket_blocks(i));
bidx += idx * bucket_blocks(level);
return bidx;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists