[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240724171944.GA811274@neeraj.linux>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:49:44 +0530
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@...nel.org>
To: riel@...riel.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: print only local CPU info when sched_clock goes
backward
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:07:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:49:41PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > About 40% of all csd_lock warnings observed in our fleet appear to
> > be due to sched_clock() going backward in time (usually only a little
> > bit), resulting in ts0 being larger than ts2.
> >
> > When the local CPU is at fault, we should print out a message reflecting
> > that, rather than trying to get the remote CPU's stack trace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
>
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
I have included this patch as part of the CSD-lock diagnostics series
which is submitted for review and planned for v6.12 [1]. I have also
included it in RCU tree [2] for more testing.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240722133559.GA667117@neeraj.linux/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/neeraj.upadhyay/linux-rcu.git/log/?h=next
- Neeraj
> > ---
> > kernel/smp.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index f085ebcdf9e7..5656ef63ea82 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -237,6 +237,14 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
> > if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns || csd_lock_timeout_ns == 0))
> > return false;
> >
> > + if (ts0 > ts2) {
> > + /* Our own sched_clock went backward; don't blame another CPU. */
> > + ts_delta = ts0 - ts2;
> > + pr_alert("sched_clock on CPU %d went backward by %llu ns\n", raw_smp_processor_id(), ts_delta);
> > + *ts1 = ts2;
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > firsttime = !*bug_id;
> > if (firsttime)
> > *bug_id = atomic_inc_return(&csd_bug_count);
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists