[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<172194003161.20182.11872236874793276327.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:40:31 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Load struct_ops map in
global_maps_resize test
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:22:14 -0500 you wrote:
> In prog_tests/test_global_maps_resize.c, we test various use cases for
> resizing global maps. Commit 7244100e0389 ("libbpf: Don't take direct
> pointers into BTF data from st_ops") updated libbpf to not store pointers
> to volatile BTF data, which for some users, was causing a UAF when resizing
> a datasec array.
>
> Let's ensure we have coverage for resizing datasec arrays with struct_ops
> progs by also including a struct_ops map and struct_ops prog in the
> test_global_map_resize skeleton. The map is automatically loaded, so we
> don't need to do anything other than add it to the BPF prog being tested
> to get the coverage.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Load struct_ops map in global_maps_resize test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7d30b8aa4fc3
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists