lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240725035954.GA2317@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:29:54 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
Cc: mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] bus: mhi: host: pci_generic: Update the file path
 for Foxconn SDX55/SDX72

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:29:40AM +0800, Slark Xiao wrote:
> To separate the images of Foxconn from other vendors, adding a
> new foxconn subfolder under qcom/<platform> for edl image path.
> And delete the fw patch since it's useless for Foxconn devices.
> 
> Fixes: bf30a75e6e00 ("bus: mhi: host: Add support for Foxconn SDX72 modems")
> Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
> ---
> v2: change the folder path architecture
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> index 14a11880bcea..f159a9dd53e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> @@ -433,8 +433,7 @@ static const struct mhi_controller_config modem_foxconn_sdx72_config = {
>  
>  static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_sdx55_info = {
>  	.name = "foxconn-sdx55",
> -	.fw = "qcom/sdx55m/sbl1.mbn",
> -	.edl = "qcom/sdx55m/edl.mbn",
> +	.edl = "qcom/sdx55m/foxconn/prog_firehose_sdx55.mbn",

I think you misunderstood what I suggested in earlier revision. You should add
the Foxconn specific fw only if it is different from the qcom one. Is it really
different for all these modems? Otherwise, what is the point of adding them?

- Mani

>  	.config = &modem_foxconn_sdx55_config,
>  	.bar_num = MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM,
>  	.dma_data_width = 32,
> @@ -444,8 +443,7 @@ static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_sdx55_info = {
>  
>  static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_t99w175_info = {
>  	.name = "foxconn-t99w175",
> -	.fw = "qcom/sdx55m/sbl1.mbn",
> -	.edl = "qcom/sdx55m/edl.mbn",
> +	.edl = "qcom/sdx55m/foxconn/prog_firehose_sdx55.mbn",
>  	.config = &modem_foxconn_sdx55_config,
>  	.bar_num = MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM,
>  	.dma_data_width = 32,
> @@ -455,8 +453,7 @@ static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_t99w175_info = {
>  
>  static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_dw5930e_info = {
>  	.name = "foxconn-dw5930e",
> -	.fw = "qcom/sdx55m/sbl1.mbn",
> -	.edl = "qcom/sdx55m/edl.mbn",
> +	.edl = "qcom/sdx55m/foxconn/prog_firehose_sdx55.mbn",
>  	.config = &modem_foxconn_sdx55_config,
>  	.bar_num = MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM,
>  	.dma_data_width = 32,
> @@ -502,7 +499,7 @@ static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_dw5932e_info = {
>  
>  static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_t99w515_info = {
>  	.name = "foxconn-t99w515",
> -	.edl = "fox/sdx72m/edl.mbn",
> +	.edl = "qcom/sdx72m/foxconn/edl.mbn",
>  	.edl_trigger = true,
>  	.config = &modem_foxconn_sdx72_config,
>  	.bar_num = MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM,
> @@ -513,7 +510,7 @@ static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_t99w515_info = {
>  
>  static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_foxconn_dw5934e_info = {
>  	.name = "foxconn-dw5934e",
> -	.edl = "fox/sdx72m/edl.mbn",
> +	.edl = "qcom/sdx72m/foxconn/edl.mbn",
>  	.edl_trigger = true,
>  	.config = &modem_foxconn_sdx72_config,
>  	.bar_num = MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ