[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51099628-b820-45cc-8af5-5cfa604736a2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 08:35:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...dex.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>, heiko@...ech.de,
mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, jose.abreu@...opsys.com, nelson.costa@...opsys.com,
shawn.wen@...k-chips.com, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com,
hverkuil@...all.nl, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: media: Document bindings for HDMI RX
Controller
On 24/07/2024 15:20, Johan Jonker wrote:
>
>>
>> Where did you learn that? Having non-SoC specific generic fallback
>> compatibles is pretty much standard throughout the kernel. See for
>> example these RK3588 DesignWare compatibles:
>>
>> Synopsys Serial Controller:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/snps-dw-apb-uart.yaml
>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";
>
> Compatible method #2:
> { .compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart", .data = &dw8250_dw_apb },
>
>>
>> Synopsys USB3 Controller:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/rockchip,dwc3.yaml
>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-dwc3", "snps,dwc3";
>
> Compatible method #2:
> {
> .compatible = "snps,dwc3"
> },
>
>>
>> Synopsys Ethernet Controller:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-gmac", "snps,dwmac-4.20a";
>
> Compatible method #1:
> { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-gmac", .data = &rk3588_ops },
>
> of_device_is_compatible(np, "snps,dwmac-4.20a") ||
>
>>
>> Synsopsys SATA Controller:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/rockchip,dwc-ahci.yaml
>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-dwc-ahci", "snps,dwc-ahci"
>
> Compatible method #2:
> { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", &ahci_dwc_plat },
>
>>
>> It's also not specific to Synopsys (but RK3588 has a lot of Synopsys
>> design incl. the HDMI-RX IP currently worked on by Shreeya). Here
>> are some other examples:
>>
>> ARM Mali GPU:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-valhall-csf.yaml
>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-mali", "arm,mali-valhall-csf";
>
> Should be compatible method #2:
> { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-mali" },
> { .compatible = "arm,mali-valhall-csf" },
>
> This is wrong!
Except that it is pointless and redundant, why is it wrong? You did not
bring any argument, except "will trigger 2 probes" which is clearly false.
> Each strings will trigger a probe.
What? That's not true.
> The string "rockchip,rk3588-mali" should be removed.
>
> Review was done by Collabora people and without including the Rockchip mail list.
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240229162230.2634044-12-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
>
> Could someone look at this and test.
No need, just read how device matching and probing works...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists