[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppZ5V8dFC5z1ZG0u0ed9HwGgJRzGTYL-7k2oGO9FB+Weg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:49:41 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'vddpe-3v3-supply' again
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 09:17, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 08:22:54PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 05:13:28PM GMT, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Commit 756485bfbb85 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,pcie-sc7280: Move SC7280 to
> > > dedicated schema") incorrectly removed 'vddpe-3v3-supply' from the
> > > bindings, which results in DT checker warnings like:
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-dora.dtb: pcie@...000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('vddpe-3v3-supply' was unexpected)
> > > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml#
> > >
> > > Note that this property has been part of the Qualcomm PCIe bindings
> > > since 2018 and would need to be deprecated rather than simply removed if
> > > there is a desire to replace it with 'vpcie3v3' which is used for some
> > > non-Qualcomm controllers.
> >
> > I think Rob Herring suggested [1] adding the property to the root port
> > node rather than the host. If that suggestion still applies it might be
> > better to enable the deprecated propertly only for the hosts, which
> > already used it, and to define a new property at the root port.
>
> You seem to miss the point that this is just restoring status quo (and
> that the property has not yet been deprecated).
You are restoring it for all platforms. However in my opinion it's
better to follow Rob's suggestion and to add new property to the
device where it actually belongs, rather than hacking up the PCIe host
device. More importantly with the arrival of the power sequencing
subsystem we can handle powering up PCIe devices properly.
> I assume you've already read my reply to Rob's bot, but here it is for
> reference for others:
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zp_LPixNnh-2Fy5N@hovoldconsulting.com/
>
> Johan
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists