[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240725114200.375611-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:42:00 +0800
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/pelt: Use rq_clock_task() for hw_pressure
commit 97450eb90965 ("sched/pelt: Remove shift of thermal clock")
removed the decay_shift for hw_pressure. While looking at a related
bug report, it is found that this commit uses the sched_clock_task()
in sched_tick() while replaces the sched_clock_task() with rq_clock_pelt()
in __update_blocked_others(). This could bring inconsistence. One possible
scenario I can think of is in ___update_load_sum():
u64 delta = now - sa->last_update_time
'now' could be calculated by rq_clock_pelt() from
__update_blocked_others(), and last_update_time was calculated by
rq_clock_task() previously from sched_tick(). Usually the former chases
after the latter, it cause a very large 'delta' and brings unexpected
behavior. Although this should not impact x86 platform in the bug report,
it should be fixed for other platforms.
Fixes: 97450eb90965 ("sched/pelt: Remove shift of thermal clock")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407091527.bb0be229-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9057584ec06d..cfd4755954fd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9362,7 +9362,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
decayed = update_rt_rq_load_avg(now, rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class) |
update_dl_rq_load_avg(now, rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class) |
- update_hw_load_avg(now, rq, hw_pressure) |
+ update_hw_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, hw_pressure) |
update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
if (others_have_blocked(rq))
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists