lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqJMKvwr6nxPjb9v@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:59:22 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/test: use kunit action wrapper macro in the gem
 shmem test suite

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:10:35PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
> Replace deferred action function wrappers with equivalent ones defined
> using the macro introduced by commit 56778b49c9a2 ("kunit: Add a macro to
> wrap a deferred action function")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>

Merged to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch.
-Sima

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c | 27 ++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
> index c3758faa1b83..f7f7d8b0f61f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
> @@ -23,29 +23,16 @@
>  #define TEST_BYTE		0xae
>  
>  /*
> - * Wrappers to avoid an explicit type casting when passing action
> - * functions to kunit_add_action().
> + * Wrappers to avoid cast warnings when passing action functions
> + * directly to kunit_add_action().
>   */
> -static void kfree_wrapper(void *ptr)
> -{
> -	const void *obj = ptr;
> -
> -	kfree(obj);
> -}
> -
> -static void sg_free_table_wrapper(void *ptr)
> -{
> -	struct sg_table *sgt = ptr;
> +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kfree_wrapper, kfree, const void *);
>  
> -	sg_free_table(sgt);
> -}
> -
> -static void drm_gem_shmem_free_wrapper(void *ptr)
> -{
> -	struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem = ptr;
> +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(sg_free_table_wrapper, sg_free_table,
> +			    struct sg_table *);
>  
> -	drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> -}
> +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(drm_gem_shmem_free_wrapper, drm_gem_shmem_free,
> +			    struct drm_gem_shmem_object *);
>  
>  /*
>   * Test creating a shmem GEM object backed by shmem buffer. The test
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ