[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWUdq-xR9nOB_c_8=pfwn8J062hiurFXcrF7zvmaNg8PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 22:54:06 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2] arm64: Rename to KERNEL_IMAGE_COMPRESSED_INSTALL kconfig for
compressed kernel image
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 10:42 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 12:51, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The COMPRESSED_INSTALL does not sound very meaningful.
>
> Why do you care? The question looks like this:
>
> Install compressed image by default (COMPRESSED_INSTALL) [N/y/?] (NEW)
>
> which actually fits on a line and makes perfect sense.
>
> Your patch seems to only make things worse for no real gain.
>
Yes, the new kconfig is longer - not ideal.
And when you check a diff of two of your ARM64 .config?
What says COMPRESSED_INSTALL to other than the author w/o context :-)?
You are right, why should I care - I have no ARM54 hardware.
-Sedat.
-Sedat-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists