lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240726215701.19459-21-frederic@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 23:56:56 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
	rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 20/20] rcu: Use kthread preferred affinity for RCU exp kworkers

Now that kthreads have an infrastructure to handle preferred affinity
against CPU hotplug and housekeeping cpumask, convert RCU exp workers to
use it instead of handling all the constraints by itself.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 105 +++++++++-------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index e038f4abb872..f3e40a1dea65 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4777,6 +4777,22 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
 	rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
 }
 
+static void rcu_thread_affine_rnp(struct task_struct *t, struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	cpumask_var_t affinity;
+	int cpu;
+
+	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&affinity, GFP_KERNEL))
+		return;
+
+	for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, affinity);
+
+	kthread_affine_preferred(t, affinity);
+
+	free_cpumask_var(affinity);
+}
+
 struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
 
 static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -4789,7 +4805,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	if (rnp->exp_kworker)
 		return;
 
-	kworker = kthread_run_worker(0, name, rnp_index);
+	kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, name, rnp_index);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(kworker)) {
 		pr_err("Failed to create par gp kworker on %d/%d\n",
 		       rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi);
@@ -4799,16 +4815,9 @@ static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD))
 		sched_setscheduler_nocheck(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
-}
 
-static struct task_struct *rcu_exp_par_gp_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	struct kthread_worker *kworker = READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_kworker);
-
-	if (!kworker)
-		return NULL;
-
-	return kworker->task;
+	rcu_thread_affine_rnp(kworker->task, rnp);
+	wake_up_process(kworker->task);
 }
 
 static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
@@ -4893,79 +4902,6 @@ int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void rcu_thread_affine_rnp(struct task_struct *t, struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	cpumask_var_t affinity;
-	int cpu;
-
-	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&affinity, GFP_KERNEL))
-		return;
-
-	for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, affinity);
-
-	kthread_affine_preferred(t, affinity);
-
-	free_cpumask_var(affinity);
-}
-
-/*
- * Update kthreads affinity during CPU-hotplug changes.
- *
- * Set the per-rcu_node kthread's affinity to cover all CPUs that are
- * served by the rcu_node in question.  The CPU hotplug lock is still
- * held, so the value of rnp->qsmaskinit will be stable.
- *
- * We don't include outgoingcpu in the affinity set, use -1 if there is
- * no outgoing CPU.  If there are no CPUs left in the affinity set,
- * this function allows the kthread to execute on any CPU.
- *
- * Any future concurrent calls are serialized via ->kthread_mutex.
- */
-static void rcutree_affinity_setting(unsigned int cpu, int outgoingcpu)
-{
-	cpumask_var_t cm;
-	unsigned long mask;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp;
-	struct rcu_node *rnp;
-	struct task_struct *task_exp;
-
-	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
-	rnp = rdp->mynode;
-
-	task_exp = rcu_exp_par_gp_task(rnp);
-
-	/*
-	 * If CPU is the boot one, this task is created later from early
-	 * initcall since kthreadd must be created first.
-	 */
-	if (!task_exp)
-		return;
-
-	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
-	mask = rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp);
-	for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
-		if ((mask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) &&
-		    cpu != outgoingcpu)
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cm);
-	cpumask_and(cm, cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
-	if (cpumask_empty(cm)) {
-		cpumask_copy(cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
-		if (outgoingcpu >= 0)
-			cpumask_clear_cpu(outgoingcpu, cm);
-	}
-
-	if (task_exp)
-		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task_exp, cm);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
-
-	free_cpumask_var(cm);
-}
-
 /*
  * Has the specified (known valid) CPU ever been fully online?
  */
@@ -4994,7 +4930,6 @@ int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
 		return 0; /* Too early in boot for scheduler work. */
 	sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(cpu);
-	rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, -1);
 
 	// Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
 	tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
@@ -5207,8 +5142,6 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	rnp->ffmask &= ~rdp->grpmask;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 
-	rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
-
 	// nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
 	tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.45.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ