linux-kernel - [PATCH v12 06/84] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip the "try unsync" path iff the old SPTE was a leaf SPTE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240726235234.228822-7-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:51:15 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, 
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, 
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v12 06/84] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip the "try unsync" path iff the
 old SPTE was a leaf SPTE

Apply make_spte()'s optimization to skip trying to unsync shadow pages if
and only if the old SPTE was a leaf SPTE, as non-leaf SPTEs in direct MMUs
are always writable, i.e. could trigger a false positive and incorrectly
lead to KVM creating a SPTE without write-protecting or marking shadow
pages unsync.

This bug only affects the TDP MMU, as the shadow MMU only overwrites a
shadow-present SPTE when synchronizing SPTEs (and only 4KiB SPTEs can be
unsync).  Specifically, mmu_set_spte() drops any non-leaf SPTEs *before*
calling make_spte(), whereas the TDP MMU can do a direct replacement of a
page table with the leaf SPTE.

Opportunistically update the comment to explain why skipping the unsync
stuff is safe, as opposed to simply saying "it's someone else's problem".

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index d4527965e48c..a3baf0cadbee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -226,12 +226,20 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
 
 		/*
-		 * Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
-		 * lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
-		 * is responsibility of kvm_mmu_get_page / kvm_mmu_sync_roots.
-		 * Same reasoning can be applied to dirty page accounting.
+		 * When overwriting an existing leaf SPTE, and the old SPTE was
+		 * writable, skip trying to unsync shadow pages as any relevant
+		 * shadow pages must already be unsync, i.e. the hash lookup is
+		 * unnecessary (and expensive).
+		 *
+		 * The same reasoning applies to dirty page/folio accounting;
+		 * KVM will mark the folio dirty using the old SPTE, thus
+		 * there's no need to immediately mark the new SPTE as dirty.
+		 *
+		 * Note, both cases rely on KVM not changing PFNs without first
+		 * zapping the old SPTE, which is guaranteed by both the shadow
+		 * MMU and the TDP MMU.
 		 */
-		if (is_writable_pte(old_spte))
+		if (is_last_spte(old_spte, level) && is_writable_pte(old_spte))
 			goto out;
 
 		/*
-- 
2.46.0.rc1.232.g9752f9e123-goog