lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dx32q3sa4oopk3fnm2zyeplotuq6gq3rmnbmaw3mo4q3lgjpe7@gvpgu4rdk4f4>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:19:31 +0530
From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Kowshik Jois B S <kowsjois@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Fix crash during pci_dev hot-unplug on pseries
 KVM guest

Hi Bjorn,

On 2024/07/25 03:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:15:39PM +0530, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > ...
> > The crash in question is a critical issue that we would want to have
> > a fix for soon. And while this is still being figured out, is it
> > okay to go with the fix I proposed in the V1 of this patch?
> 
> v6.10 has been released already, and it will be a couple months before
> the v6.11 release.
> 
> It looks like the regression is 407d1a51921e, which appeared in v6.6,
> almost a year ago, so it's fairly old.
> 
> What target are you thinking about for the V1 patch?  I guess if we
> add it as a v6.11 post-merge window fix, it might get backported to
> stable kernels before v6.11?  

Yes, I think we can go ahead with taking V1 patch for v6.11 post-merge window to
fix the current bug and ask Ubuntu to pick it while Lizhi's proposed patch goes
under test and review.

Thanks,
Amit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ