[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqNu8zwjhiTkbpIB@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:40:03 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] mm: introduce numa_memblks
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:48:42PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2024, at 20:35, Zi Yan wrote:
> > On 24 Jul 2024, at 18:44, Zi Yan wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have tested this series on both x86_64 and arm64. It works fine on x86_64.
> >> All numa=fake= options work as they did before the series.
> >>
> >> But I am not able to boot the kernel (no printout at all) on arm64 VM
> >> (Mac mini M1 VMWare). By git bisecting, arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks
> >> is the first patch causing the boot failure. I see the warning:
> >>
> >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: numa_add_cpu+0x1c (section: .text) -> early_cpu_to_node (section: .init.text)
> >>
> >> I am not sure if it is red herring or not, since changing early_cpu_to_node
> >> to cpu_to_node in numa_add_cpu() from mm/numa_emulation.c did get rid of the
> >> warning, but the system still failed to boot.
> >>
> >> Please note that you need binutils 2.40 to build the arm64 kernel, since there
> >> is a bug(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31924) in 2.42 preventing
> >> arm64 kernel from booting as well.
> >>
> >> My config is attached.
> >
> > I get more info after adding earlycon to the boot option.
> > pgdat is NULL, causing issues when free_area_init_node() is dereferencing
> > it at first WARN_ON.
> >
> > FYI, my build is this series on top of v6.10 instead of the base commit,
> > where the series applies cleanly on top v6.10.
>
> OK, the issue comes from that my arm64 VM has no ACPI but x86_64 VM has it,
> thus on arm64 VM numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_ini) failed in arch_numa_init()
> and the code falls back to numa_init(dummy_numa_init). In dummy_numa_init(),
> before patch 23 "arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks", numa_add_memblk()
> from drivers/base/arch_numa.c is called on arm64, which unconditionally
> set 0 to numa_nodes_parsed. This is missing in the x86 version of
> numa_add_memblk(), which is now used by all arch. By adding the patch
> below, my arm64 kernel boots in the VM.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index 806550239d08..354f15b8d9b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> pr_err("NUMA init failed\n");
> return ret;
> }
> + node_set(0, numa_nodes_parsed);
>
> numa_off = true;
> return 0;
>
>
> Feel free to add
>
> Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
>
> after you incorporate the fix.
Thanks a lot for testing, debugging and fixing!
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists