[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024072615-hassle-enclose-673f@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:12:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: fsa4480: Check if the chip is really there
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 01:43:30PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>
> Currently, the driver will happily register the switch/mux devices, and
> so long as the i2c master doesn't complain, the user would never know
> there's something wrong.
>
> Add a device id check (based on [1]) and return -ENODEV if the read
> fails or returns nonsense.
>
> Checking the value on a Qualcomm SM6115P-based Lenovo Tab P11 tablet,
> the ID mentioned in the datasheet does indeed show up:
> fsa4480 1-0042: Found FSA4480 v1.1 (Vendor ID = 0)
>
> [1] https://www.onsemi.com/pdf/datasheet/fsa4480-d.pdf
>
> Fixes: 1dc246320c6b ("usb: typec: mux: Add On Semi fsa4480 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
You can't sign off on a patch twice, that makes no sense, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists