[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84DBD5CC-BFA9-497F-8545-48D181FCD517@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:20:52 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
CC: "Hong, Yifan" <jacky8hyf@...il.com>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Linux
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"bugzilla-daemon@...nel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 219094] gen_kheaders.sh gets stuck in an infinite loop (on
tmpfs)
> On Jul 25, 2024, at 9:05 PM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Please send responses by email reply-to-all rather than through bugzilla.
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, bugzilla-daemon@...nel.org wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219094
>>
>> Hong, Yifan (jacky8hyf@...il.com) reports:
>>
>> I have hit a similar bug to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681, but on tmpfs.
>>
>> Here's a small reproducer for the bug, from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681#c1:
>>
>> ```
>> #include <sys/types.h>
>> #include <dirent.h>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> {
>> DIR *dir = opendir(".");
>> struct dirent *dd;
>>
>> while ((dd = readdir(dir))) {
>> printf("%s\n", dd->d_name);
>> rename(dd->d_name, "TEMPFILE");
>> rename("TEMPFILE", dd->d_name);
>> }
>> closedir(dir);
>> }
>> ```
>>
>> Run in a directory with multiple (2000) files, it does not complete on tmpfs. I created a tmpfs mount point via
>>
>> ```
>> mount -o size=1G -t tmpfs none ~/tmpfs/mount/
>> ```
>>
>> The other bug was fixed on btrfs via https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c9ceb0e15d92d0634600603b38965d9b6d986b6d.1691923900.git.fdmanana@suse.com/. Could anyone please see if the issue can be ported to tmpfs as well? Thanks in advance!
>>
>> I am using a `Linux version 6.6.15` kernel, if that's useful to anyone.
>
> Thank you for reporting, Yifan; and thank you for the easy reproducer, Rob.
>
> Yes, it appears that tmpfs was okay for this up to v6.5, but cannot cope
> from v6.6 onwards - a likely-sounding fix went into v6.10, but that must
> have been for something different, v6.10 still failing on this repro.
>
> Chuck, I'm hoping that you will have time to spare to solve this in latest;
> and then we shall want a backport (of only this fix, or more?) for v6.6 LTS.
Well, I don't have time, but I will indeed have a look. ;-)
This does look awfully similar to the rename bug I fixed
recently in this code.
Meanwhile, can I ask that someone else begin collecting these
reproducers to add to fstests? Christian and I have both run
fstests repeatedly against tmpfs and it does not seem to find
these corner cases.
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists