[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14f57121-46f1-4dbe-92fd-e840705b771b@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:00:42 +0530
From: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen
Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vladimir
Zapolskiy" <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli
<quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
"Ajit
Pandey" <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Remove required-opps from
required list on SM8650
On 7/24/2024 1:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/07/2024 07:28, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>> On SM8650, the minimum voltage corner supported on MMCX from cmd-db is
>> sufficient for clock controllers to operate and there is no need to specify
>> the required-opps. Hence remove the required-opps property from the list of
>> required properties for SM8650 camcc and videocc bindings.
>>
>> This fixes:
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@...0000:
>> 'required-opps' is a required property
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@...0000:
>> 'required-opps' is a required property
>>
>> Fixes: a6a61b9701d1 ("dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SM8650 video clock controller")
>> Fixes: 1ae3f0578e0e ("dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SM8650 camera clock controller")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407070147.C9c3oTqS-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Made required: conditional and dropped required-opps from it only for SM8650 platform
>> - Dropped Krzysztof Acked-by tag due to above changes
>> - Link to V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240708130836.19273-1-quic_jkona@quicinc.com/#r
>>
>> .../bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml | 26 +++++++++++++------
>> .../bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml | 25 +++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml
>> index f58edfc10f4c..8698c801ed11 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml
>> @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ description: |
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm8650-camcc.h
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,x1e80100-camcc.h
>>
>> -allOf:
>> - - $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
>> -
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> enum:
>> @@ -53,11 +50,24 @@ properties:
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> -required:
>
> You cannot remove required block.
>
>> - - compatible
>> - - clocks
>> - - power-domains
>> - - required-opps
>> +allOf:
>> + - $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: qcom,sm8650-camcc
>> + then:
>> + required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - clocks
>> + - power-domains
>> + else:
>> + required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - clocks
>> + - power-domains
>> + - required-opps
>>
>> unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
>> index b2792b4bb554..2e5a061f33d6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
>> @@ -40,15 +40,26 @@ properties:
>> description:
>> A phandle to an OPP node describing required MMCX performance point.
>>
>> -required:
>
> No, you cannot remove required block.
>
> To clarify: there is almost no single binding using your style. Even if
> there is one, then 99 others are using it differently. Do not implement
> things entirely different than everyone else. This is the same for C
> code you send upstream. No difference here...
>
Thanks Krzysztof for the explanation.
Hi Dmitry,
As we discussed during SM8650 camcc and videocc changes, the MMCX rail's
minimum voltage level from cmd-db is adequate for these clock
controllers to operate on SM8650. So, we removed the 'required-opps'
property from their DT nodes.
Although 'required-opps' will remain in the properties list, it’s not
mandatory to be present in 'required:' list, as it is dependent on
cmd-db minimum level. So, can I please go ahead and update these
bindings to remove 'required-opps' from the 'required:' list, as done in
v1 of this series.
It seems unconventional to make 'required:' conditional based on the
platform type.
v1 link:-
https://lore.kernel.org/all/rbej7rbjiwtgf4reiomtmlv3ef3ljfys5yfzypigrertylucu7@be3v65aeuimb/
Thanks,
Jagadeesh
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists