linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Add initial Exynos850 support to the thermal driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240726150348eucms1p356a6209b11c81924a1dac027555466cd@eucms1p3>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:03:48 +0200
From: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>
To: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
	<bzolnier@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "Rafael J.
 Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob
	Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, ALIM AKHTAR
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>, Anand
	Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Add initial Exynos850 support to the thermal
 driver

Forgot to mention it in the cover letter, but as discussed in v1 in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPLW+4nfEjP4FDjRJORyyKk46x4VfFAcMuK88jXUT_LJoP1N_g@mail.gmail.com,
this requires support for the TMU clock to run, available in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240723163311.28654-2-semen.protsenko@linaro.org.
This series builds fine without this, only it is not possible to write a
devicetree source for this without the mentioned series, so as I
understand it is ok for this to be in review anyway?

By the way, I am going to have some more time to help with the upstream
kernel, and have access to most of the supported SoCs. If you feel that
it is appropriate, I would be very happy to become one of the
maintainers of this driver :)