[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <957b3c13-e4ba-45e3-b880-7a313e48c33f@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:52:52 -0700
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Amadeusz Sławiński
<amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<perex@...ex.cz>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, <bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 32/32] ASoC: doc: Add documentation for SOC USB
Hi Pierre/Amadeusz,
On 7/8/2024 4:16 PM, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> On 7/4/2024 4:25 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>> Just so I understand...is it really desired that userspace doesn't
>>>> have the flexibility to choose which USB device is offloaded? I know
>>>> it complicates what needs to be done, but it could be just an
>>>> additional feature that can be added later on. Again, by default, we
>>>> select the last USB headset plugged in to be enabled for offload by
>>>> default.
>>> If it chooses endpoint by itself perhaps you can send patch set without
>>> controls first? This has added benefit of less patches in series, making
>>> it easier to review and it won't block whole patch set by discussion on
>>> controls feature. Controls can be added in followup series.
>> We do need read-only controls for userspace to know that offload is
>> possible and which card/device to use. That can be done in a first step
>> assuming there's a single device plugged-in.
> I agree, some kcontrol need to be present to at least determine:
>
> 1. USB SND device is offload capable (ASoC card and PCM index)- Fetches associated (mapped) ASoC platform card and PCM index (read only)
>
> 2. ASoC platform card offload status - Current offload status (read only)
>
> Those would be the minimum kcontrols we could have at this time. I will remove the device selection part, and leave that for future discussions. Does this sound good, Amadeusz/Pierre?
So I reworked the series a bit with respects to the kcontrols that we had, and I simplified it for the next submission. I went ahead and just have a read only kcontrol residing in the USB SND device and will implement #1 above:
/ # tinymix -D 1 contents
Number of controls: 9
ctl type num name value
0 INT 2 Capture Channel Map 0, 0 (range 0->36)
1 INT 2 Playback Channel Map 0, 0 (range 0->36)
2 BOOL 1 Headset Capture Switch On
3 INT 1 Headset Capture Volume 10 (range 0->13)
4 BOOL 1 Sidetone Playback Switch On
5 INT 1 Sidetone Playback Volume 4096 (range 0->8192)
6 BOOL 1 Headset Playback Switch On
7 INT 2 Headset Playback Volume 20, 20 (range 0->24)
8 INT 2 USB Offload Playback Route PCM#0 0, 0 (range -1->255)
If there is an available audio offload path, then the value will show the card and pcm index that it is mapped to. That way the application will know which card/pcm device to open from there. In the above example, the offload path is mapped to card#0 pcm#0. If there is no offload path available, it will show -1, -1.
For now, I removed the control that allows for explicit selection of which USB card and PCM device to offload, and will take this up on a separate series as we see fit. The codebase I have now will select the last USB headset plugged in for offloading. Will clean up the changes and submit a new revision with the other feedback included as well.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
>
>> Dealing with multiple devices and defining rules or configuration
>> options to select the offloaded device is a second-level problem.
>>
>> In most cases the only thing that will be offloaded is a headset
>> anyways, so the selection could be rather static based on a
>> vendor/system ID, all other USB devices would be ignored.
> If the USB SND offload driver (ie qc_audio_offload) isn't compiled in, then it would be disabled. Do we need some over-arching mechanism to disable the offload functionality? Although, one thing I can see if I can add is some device classification within the USB offload vendor driver.
>
> Thanks
>
> Wesley Cheng
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists