[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXGCsOMww5yd_W8Jiq1eYoiubrdHfjki+phc2-=54WPeGf2zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:13:40 +0500
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linuxarm@...wei.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, guohanjun@...wei.com, gshan@...hat.com,
miguel.luis@...cle.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Bowman, Terry" <Terry.bowman@....com>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: 6.11/regression/bisected - The commit c1385c1f0ba3 caused a new
possible recursive locking detected warning at computer boot.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 1:35 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 26 2024 at 19:01, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I tested it on an emulated setup with your changes on top of
> > mainline as of today and the issue is resolved.
> >
> > Would you mind posting a formal patch? Or I can do it on Monday if that's
> > easier for you.
>
> Go for it. I have enough stuff on my plate to deal with :)
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Thanks, Thomas.
With this patch, the issue has also gone.
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
Download attachment "6.10.0-d67978318827-with-static-branch-enable-patch.zip" of type "application/zip" (57228 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists