linux-kernel - [PATCH 14/24] sched/fair: Implement ENQUEUE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240727105029.888107381@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:27:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com,
 peterz@...radead.org,
 juri.lelli@...hat.com,
 vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
 dietmar.eggemann@....com,
 rostedt@...dmis.org,
 bsegall@...gle.com,
 mgorman@...e.de,
 vschneid@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kprateek.nayak@....com,
 wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
 youssefesmat@...omium.org,
 tglx@...utronix.de,
 efault@....de
Subject: [PATCH 14/24] sched/fair: Implement ENQUEUE_DELAYED

Doing a wakeup on a delayed dequeue task is about as simple as it
sounds -- remove the delayed mark and enjoy the fact it was actually
still on the runqueue.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5290,6 +5290,9 @@ static inline int cfs_rq_throttled(struc
 static inline bool cfs_bandwidth_used(void);
 
 static void
+requeue_delayed_entity(struct sched_entity *se);
+
+static void
 enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 {
 	bool curr = cfs_rq->curr == se;
@@ -5922,8 +5925,10 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cf
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 
-		if (se->on_rq)
+		if (se->on_rq) {
+			SCHED_WARN_ON(se->sched_delayed);
 			break;
+		}
 		enqueue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
 
 		if (cfs_rq_is_idle(group_cfs_rq(se)))
@@ -6773,6 +6778,22 @@ static int sched_idle_cpu(int cpu)
 }
 #endif
 
+static void
+requeue_delayed_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+
+	/*
+	 * se->sched_delayed should imply both: se->on_rq == 1.
+	 * Because a delayed entity is one that is still on
+	 * the runqueue competing until elegibility.
+	 */
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->sched_delayed);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq);
+
+	se->sched_delayed = 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is
  * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
@@ -6787,6 +6812,11 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
 	int task_new = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
 	int rq_h_nr_running = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
 
+	if (flags & ENQUEUE_DELAYED) {
+		requeue_delayed_entity(se);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
 	 * the cfs_rq utilization to select a frequency.
@@ -6804,8 +6834,11 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
 		cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT);
 
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
-		if (se->on_rq)
+		if (se->on_rq) {
+			if (se->sched_delayed)
+				requeue_delayed_entity(se);
 			break;
+		}
 		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 		enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);