[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240727105029.486423066@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:27:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kprateek.nayak@....com,
wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
efault@....de
Subject: [PATCH 11/24] sched/fair: Assert {set_next,put_prev}_entity() are properly balanced
Just a little sanity test..
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5432,6 +5432,7 @@ set_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s
}
update_stats_curr_start(cfs_rq, se);
+ SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->curr);
cfs_rq->curr = se;
/*
@@ -5493,6 +5494,7 @@ static void put_prev_entity(struct cfs_r
/* in !on_rq case, update occurred at dequeue */
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, prev, 0);
}
+ SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->curr != prev);
cfs_rq->curr = NULL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists