[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ikwqud73.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:22:40 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: ysionneau@...rayinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jonathan Borne <jborne@...rayinc.com>, Julian Vetter
<jvetter@...rayinc.com>, Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>, Clement
Leger <clement@...ment-leger.fr>, Julien Hascoet <jhascoet@...rayinc.com>,
Louis Morhet <lmorhet@...rayinc.com>, Luc Michel <luc@...chel.fr>, Marius
Gligor <mgligor@...rayinc.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/37] kvx: Add multi-processor (SMP) support
On Mon, Jul 22 2024 at 11:41, ysionneau@...rayinc.com wrote:
> +
> +int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + __cpu_up_stack_pointer[cpu] = task_stack_page(tidle) + THREAD_SIZE;
> + __cpu_up_task_pointer[cpu] = tidle;
> + /* We need to be sure writes are committed */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + if (!smp_ops.smp_boot_secondary) {
> + pr_err_once("No smp_ops registered: could not bring up secondary CPUs\n");
> + return -ENOSYS;
> + }
> +
> + ret = smp_ops.smp_boot_secondary(cpu);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + /* CPU was successfully started */
> + while (!cpu_online(cpu))
> + cpu_relax();
Please use the generic CPU hotplug synchronization mechanisms CONFIG_HOTPLUG_*_SYNC
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists