lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aba35ecb-2357-4c4f-8366-08d14e40d436@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:10:21 +0800
From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
 festevam@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org,
 aisheng.dong@....com, agx@...xcpu.org, francesco@...cini.it, frank.li@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Add Freescale i.MX8qxp Display Controller
 support

Hi,

On 7/28/24 00:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch series aims to add Freescale i.MX8qxp Display Controller support.
>>
>> The controller is comprised of three main components that include a blit
>> engine for 2D graphics accelerations, display controller for display output
>> processing, as well as a command sequencer.
>>
>> Previous patch series attempts to do that can be found at:
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/84524/
>>
>> This series addresses Maxime's comments on the previous one:
>> a. Split the display controller into multiple internal devices.
>>     1) List display engine, pixel engine, interrupt controller and more as the
>>        controller's child devices.
>>     2) List display engine and pixel engine's processing units as their child
>>        devices.
>>
>> b. Add minimal feature support.
>>     Only support two display pipelines with primary planes with XR24 fb,
>>     backed by two fetchunits.  No fetchunit dynamic allocation logic(to be done
>>     when necessary).
>>
>> c. Use drm_dev_{enter, exit}().
>>
>> Since this series changes a lot comparing to the previous one, I choose to
>> send it with a new patch series, not a new version.
> I'm sorry, I have started reviewing v2 without noticing that there is a
> v3 already.
> 
> Let me summarize my comments:
> 
> - You are using OF aliases. Are they documented and acked by DT
>    maintainers?
> 
> - I generally feel that the use of so many small devices to declare
>    functional blocks is an abuse of the DT. Please consider creating
>    _small_ units from the driver code directly rather than going throught
>    the components. 

Well, I really don't think so. I don't agree.

I have checked the DTSpec[1] before type, the spec isn't define how
many is considered to be "many", and the spec isn't define to what
extent is think to be "small" as well.

[1] 
https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/tag/v0.4

-- 
Best regards
Sui


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ