[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240728170915.26b4a01d@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:09:15 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
ang.iglesiasg@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com,
semen.protsenko@...aro.org, 579lpy@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] iio: pressure bmp280: Move bmp085 interrupt to
new configuration
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:10:39 +0200
Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com> wrote:
> This commit intends to add the old BMP085 sensor to the new IRQ interface
> of the sensor consistence. No functional changes intended.
>
> The BMP085 sensor is equivalent with the BMP180 with the only difference of
> BMP085 having an extra interrupt pin to inform about an End of Conversion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Trivial comments inline + as the build bot pointed out you can't use data from
one array to fill the other.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-i2c.c | 4 +-
> drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-spi.c | 4 +-
> drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c
> index 4238f37b7805..e4d017358b68 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c
> @@ -3104,13 +3104,19 @@ static irqreturn_t bmp085_eoc_irq(int irq, void *d)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static int bmp085_fetch_eoc_irq(struct device *dev,
> - const char *name,
> - int irq,
> - struct bmp280_data *data)
> +static int bmp085_trigger_probe(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> + struct bmp280_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct device *dev = data->dev;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> unsigned long irq_trig;
> - int ret;
> + int ret, irq;
> +
> + fwnode = dev_fwnode(data->dev);
> + if (!fwnode)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + irq = fwnode_irq_get(fwnode, 0);
>
> irq_trig = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(irq));
> if (irq_trig != IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING) {
> @@ -3120,13 +3126,12 @@ static int bmp085_fetch_eoc_irq(struct device *dev,
>
> init_completion(&data->done);
>
> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev,
> - irq,
> - bmp085_eoc_irq,
> - NULL,
> - irq_trig,
> - name,
> - data);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev,
> + irq,
> + bmp085_eoc_irq,
> + irq_trig,
> + indio_dev->name,
> + data);
Whilst here, put some of those parameters on the same line (staying below
80 chars).
> if (ret) {
> /* Bail out without IRQ but keep the driver in place */
> dev_err(dev, "unable to request DRDY IRQ\n");
> @@ -3137,6 +3142,44 @@ static int bmp085_fetch_eoc_irq(struct device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +const struct bmp280_chip_info bmp085_chip_info = {
> + .id_reg = bmp180_chip_info.id_reg,
As the build bot has pointed out you can't do this.
Annoying but just duplicate the original structure with whatever
changes you need.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists