linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/4] PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240728161055.2054513-3-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:10:52 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/4] PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

[ Upstream commit a4e772898f8bf2e7e1cf661a12c60a5612c4afab ]

One of the true positives that the cfg_access_lock lockdep effort
identified is this sequence:

  WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1 at drivers/pci/pci.c:4886 pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70
  RIP: 0010:pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? __warn+0x8c/0x190
   ? pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70
   ? report_bug+0x1f8/0x200
   ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70
   ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70
   ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
   ? pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70
   pci_reset_bus+0x1d8/0x270
   vmd_probe+0x778/0xa10
   pci_device_probe+0x95/0x120

Where pci_reset_bus() users are triggering unlocked secondary bus resets.
Ironically pci_bus_reset(), several calls down from pci_reset_bus(), uses
pci_bus_lock() before issuing the reset which locks everything *but* the
bridge itself.

For the same motivation as adding:

  bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
  if (bridge)
    pci_dev_lock(bridge);

to pci_reset_function() for the "bus" and "cxl_bus" reset cases, add
pci_dev_lock() for @bus->self to pci_bus_lock().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/171711747501.1628941.15217746952476635316.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Reported-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/r/6657833b3b5ae_14984b29437@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
[bhelgaas: squash in recursive locking deadlock fix from Keith Busch:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711193650.701834-1-kbusch@meta.com]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 4f229cb5d2a9f..aa2be8d815048 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -4957,10 +4957,12 @@ static void pci_bus_lock(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
 
+	pci_dev_lock(bus->self);
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
-		pci_dev_lock(dev);
 		if (dev->subordinate)
 			pci_bus_lock(dev->subordinate);
+		else
+			pci_dev_lock(dev);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4972,8 +4974,10 @@ static void pci_bus_unlock(struct pci_bus *bus)
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
 		if (dev->subordinate)
 			pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
-		pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+		else
+			pci_dev_unlock(dev);
 	}
+	pci_dev_unlock(bus->self);
 }
 
 /* Return 1 on successful lock, 0 on contention */
@@ -4981,15 +4985,15 @@ static int pci_bus_trylock(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
 
+	if (!pci_dev_trylock(bus->self))
+		return 0;
+
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
-		if (!pci_dev_trylock(dev))
-			goto unlock;
 		if (dev->subordinate) {
-			if (!pci_bus_trylock(dev->subordinate)) {
-				pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+			if (!pci_bus_trylock(dev->subordinate))
 				goto unlock;
-			}
-		}
+		} else if (!pci_dev_trylock(dev))
+			goto unlock;
 	}
 	return 1;
 
@@ -4997,8 +5001,10 @@ static int pci_bus_trylock(struct pci_bus *bus)
 	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
 		if (dev->subordinate)
 			pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
-		pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+		else
+			pci_dev_unlock(dev);
 	}
+	pci_dev_unlock(bus->self);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -5030,9 +5036,10 @@ static void pci_slot_lock(struct pci_slot *slot)
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
 		if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
 			continue;
-		pci_dev_lock(dev);
 		if (dev->subordinate)
 			pci_bus_lock(dev->subordinate);
+		else
+			pci_dev_lock(dev);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -5058,14 +5065,13 @@ static int pci_slot_trylock(struct pci_slot *slot)
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
 		if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
 			continue;
-		if (!pci_dev_trylock(dev))
-			goto unlock;
 		if (dev->subordinate) {
 			if (!pci_bus_trylock(dev->subordinate)) {
 				pci_dev_unlock(dev);
 				goto unlock;
 			}
-		}
+		} else if (!pci_dev_trylock(dev))
+			goto unlock;
 	}
 	return 1;
 
@@ -5076,7 +5082,8 @@ static int pci_slot_trylock(struct pci_slot *slot)
 			continue;
 		if (dev->subordinate)
 			pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
-		pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+		else
+			pci_dev_unlock(dev);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.43.0