[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5c56a65a0894497b0242a0bb80860cd@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:12:46 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Christophe JAILLET' <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, 'Jens Axboe'
<axboe@...nel.dk>, "'Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)'" <willy@...radead.org>,
'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>, 'Andrew Morton'
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 'Andy Shevchenko'
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 'Dan Carpenter'
<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...nel.org>,
"'Jason@...c4.com'" <Jason@...c4.com>, "'pedro.falcato@...il.com'"
<pedro.falcato@...il.com>, 'Mateusz Guzik' <mjguzik@...il.com>,
"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, 'Lorenzo Stoakes'
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/8] minmax: Use _Static_assert() instead of
static_assert()
From: Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: 28 July 2024 18:52
>
> Le 28/07/2024 à 16:18, David Laight a écrit :
> > The static_assert() wrapper provides the text of the expression as the
> > error message, this isn't needed here as an explicit message is provided.
> > If there is an error (quite likely for min/max) the wrapper also adds
> > two more lines of error output that just make it harder to read.
> >
> > Since it gives no benefit and actually makes things worse directly
> > using _Static_assert() is much better.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - No change.
> >
> > include/linux/minmax.h | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/minmax.h b/include/linux/minmax.h
> > index cea63a8ac80f..ab64b2e73ae5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/minmax.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/minmax.h
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> > #define __cmp_once(op, x, y, unique_x, unique_y) ({ \
> > typeof(x) unique_x = (x); \
> > typeof(y) unique_y = (y); \
> > - static_assert(__types_ok(x, y), \
> > + _Static_assert(__types_ok(x, y), \
>
> Nitpick, should there be a v3: a tab can be removed to keep things aligned.
I think that is picked up by a later patch to the same lines.
This final file looks ok.
David
>
> > #op "(" #x ", " #y ") signedness error, fix types or consider u" #op "() before " #op
> "_t()"); \
> > __cmp(op, unique_x, unique_y); })
>
> CJ
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists