[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ba1e9b9bba7cafcd3cc831ff5f2407d81409632.camel@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:20:44 +0000
From: "Okanovic, Haris" <harisokn@...zon.com>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ankur.a.arora@...cle.com" <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
CC: "joao.m.martins@...cle.com" <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, "wanpengli@...cent.com"
<wanpengli@...cent.com>, "cl@...two.org" <cl@...two.org>, "mingo@...hat.com"
<mingo@...hat.com>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com"
<misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>, "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org"
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "Okanovic, Haris" <harisokn@...zon.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>, "sudeep.holla@....com"
<sudeep.holla@....com>, "mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "mark.rutland@....com"
<mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] arm64: support cpuidle-haltpoll
On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 13:21 -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Add architectural support for cpuidle-haltpoll driver by defining
> arch_haltpoll_*().
>
> Also define ARCH_CPUIDLE_HALTPOLL to allow cpuidle-haltpoll to be
> selected, and given that we have an optimized polling mechanism
> in smp_cond_load*(), select ARCH_HAS_OPTIMIZED_POLL.
>
> smp_cond_load*() are implemented via LDXR, WFE, with LDXR loading
> a memory region in exclusive state and the WFE waiting for any
> stores to it.
>
> In the edge case -- no CPU stores to the waited region and there's no
> interrupt -- the event-stream will provide the terminating condition
> ensuring we don't wait forever, but because the event-stream runs at
> a fixed frequency (configured at 10kHz) we might spend more time in
> the polling stage than specified by cpuidle_poll_time().
>
> This would only happen in the last iteration, since overshooting the
> poll_limit means the governor moves out of the polling stage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 5d91259ee7b5..cf1c6681eb0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config ARM64
> select ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE
> select ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
> select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
> + select ARCH_HAS_OPTIMIZED_POLL
> select ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP
> select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
> select ARCH_HAS_HW_PTE_YOUNG
> @@ -2376,6 +2377,15 @@ config ARCH_HIBERNATION_HEADER
> config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
> def_bool y
>
> +config ARCH_CPUIDLE_HALTPOLL
> + bool "Enable selection of the cpuidle-haltpoll driver"
> + default n
> + help
> + cpuidle-haltpoll allows for adaptive polling based on
> + current load before entering the idle state.
> +
> + Some virtualized workloads benefit from using it.
> +
> endmenu # "Power management options"
>
> menu "CPU Power Management"
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..65f289407a6c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ARCH_HALTPOLL_H
> +#define _ARCH_HALTPOLL_H
> +
> +static inline void arch_haltpoll_enable(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void arch_haltpoll_disable(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +
> +bool arch_haltpoll_want(bool force);
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index f372295207fb..334df82a0eac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -72,3 +72,26 @@ __cpuidle int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
> lpi->index, state);
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HALTPOLL_CPUIDLE)
> +
> +#include <asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h>
> +
> +bool arch_haltpoll_want(bool force)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Enabling haltpoll requires two things:
> + *
> + * - Event stream support to provide a terminating condition to the
> + * WFE in the poll loop.
> + *
> + * - KVM support for arch_haltpoll_enable(), arch_haltpoll_enable().
typo: "arch_haltpoll_enable" and "arch_haltpoll_enable"
> + *
> + * Given that the second is missing, allow haltpoll to only be force
> + * loaded.
> + */
> + return (arch_timer_evtstrm_available() && false) || force;
This should always evaluate false without force. Perhaps you meant
something like this?
```
- return (arch_timer_evtstrm_available() && false) || force;
+ return arch_timer_evtstrm_available() || force;
```
Regards,
Haris Okanovic
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_haltpoll_want);
> +#endif
> --
> 2.43.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists