[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240729034324.366148-1-haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:43:24 +0800
From: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
To: miklos@...redi.hu,
amir73il@...il.com
Cc: linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ovl: don't set the superblock's errseq_t manually
Since commit 5679897eb104 ("vfs: make sync_filesystem return errors from
->sync_fs"), the return value from sync_fs callback can be seen in
sync_filesystem(). Thus the errseq_set opreation can be removed here.
Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
---
fs/overlayfs/super.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 06a231970cb5..fe511192f83c 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -202,15 +202,9 @@ static int ovl_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
int ret;
ret = ovl_sync_status(ofs);
- /*
- * We have to always set the err, because the return value isn't
- * checked in syncfs, and instead indirectly return an error via
- * the sb's writeback errseq, which VFS inspects after this call.
- */
- if (ret < 0) {
- errseq_set(&sb->s_wb_err, -EIO);
+
+ if (ret < 0)
return -EIO;
- }
if (!ret)
return ret;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists