lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zqgjftq6H3cDO8D0@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 09:19:26 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Testing if two open descriptors refer to the same inode

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 02:12:15PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> There needs to be a dev + ino replacement which retains the property
> of being reliable between reboots and so on.

Yes, that's exactly what filehandles provide.

OTOH, dev + ino by itself does not provide this guarantee, as st_dev
is not guaranteed to be constant across reboots because of things
like async device discovery and enumeration. i.e. userspace has to
do a bunch of work to determine the "st_dev" for a given filesystem
actually refers to the same filesystem it did before the system
restarted (e.g. via FS uuid checks).

Filehandles already contain persistent filesystem identifiers, and
so userspace doesn't have to do anything special to ensure that
comparisons across reboots are valid.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ