[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d5af39a-e7ae-47c6-8a6e-f8da5454c8d4@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:25:50 +0800
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, "Rob
Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor
Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Andy
Gross" <agross@...nel.org>
CC: <kernel@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: document QCS9100 UFS
On 7/10/2024 6:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/07/2024 15:21, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>> Document the compatible string for the UFS found on QCS9100.
>> QCS9100 is drived from SA8775p. Currently, both the QCS9100 and SA8775p
>> platform use non-SCMI resource. In the future, the SA8775p platform will
>> move to use SCMI resources and it will have new sa8775p-related device
>> tree. Consequently, introduce "qcom,qcs9100-ufshc" to describe non-SCMI
>> based UFS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
After considering the feedback provided on the subject, We have decided
to keep current SA8775p compatible and ABI compatibility in drivers.
Let's close this session and ignore the current patche here.
Thank you for your input.
--
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists