[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8v3=ykkRXSO-tqo20b_YT_iW_Z02oFSHkXhM68i8fgYcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:36:54 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g054(l1): Correct GICD and
GICR sizes
Hi Biju,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:19 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 2:40 PM
> > Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g054(l1): Correct GICD and GICR sizes
> >
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > The RZ/V2L SoC is equipped with the GIC-600. The GICD + GICDA is 128kB, and the GICR is 128kB per
> > CPU.
> >
> > Fixes: 7c2b8198f4f32 ("arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/V2L SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l1.dtsi | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi
> > index 1de2e5f0917d..8a9b61bd759a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi
> > @@ -1051,8 +1051,8 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> > #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > #address-cells = <0>;
> > interrupt-controller;
> > - reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>,
> > - <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>;
> > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>,
>
> Can we update GIC-600 in[1] based on [2] to avoid ABI breakage
> in future?
>
Sure will do.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
> IIC, As per [2], this patch series removes section GICT(GIC trace and debug page)
> and GICP(GIC PMU) and [1] does not mention first reg is for GICD + GICA.
> However, it mentions, it is for GICD.
>
> reg:
> description: |
> Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC
> registers, in the following order:
> - GIC Distributor interface (GICD)
> - GIC Redistributors (GICR), one range per redistributor region
> - GIC CPU interface (GICC)
> - GIC Hypervisor interface (GICH)
> - GIC Virtual CPU interface (GICV)
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10.1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.yaml
>
> [2] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100336/0106/programmer-s-model/the-gic-600-registers/register-map-pages?lang=en
>
>
> Cheers,
> Biju
>
>
> > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x40000>;
> > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l1.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l1.dtsi
> > index d85a6ac0f024..5c0f6c5d165e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l1.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l1.dtsi
> > @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ cpus {
> > /delete-node/ cpu@100;
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > +&gic {
> > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>,
> > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x20000>;
> > +};
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists