lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240729-bcm21664-common-v2-0-ebc21a89bf63@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 14:34:19 +0200
From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, 
 Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, 
 Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, 
 ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 0/2] ARM: dts: bcm-mobile: Split out nodes used
 by both BCM21664 and BCM23550

The BCM21664 and BCM23550 are nearly identical to each other in terms
of register layout. This was verified against a downstream kernel[1] -
Broadcom's kernel has "RDB" directories which includes headers with
the full register maps for the included hardware. Running:

  diff --recursive arch/arm/mach-{hawaii,java}/include/mach/rdb

reveals that the differences are minuscule - some things related to
ISP and H264 decoding. Most of the other differences are related to
the different CPUs in the two chipsets - the BCM21664 has 2x Cortex-A9
cores, and the BCM23550 has 4x Cortex-A7 cores.

In mainline, most drivers are also re-used between the two.

To make development for both platforms easier, split out the common
nodes into a separate DTSI, bcm2166x-common.dtsi. This only leaves
the device-specific nodes - so, CPU and related things - in the SoC-
specific DTSIs (bcm21664.dtsi and bcm23550.dtsi).

The new DTSI is based off the bcm23550.dtsi, with its split into
busses. Since it's pretty much 99% identical, I kept the licensing
of the original file (BSD 3-clause). The license for the bcm21664.dtsi
file remains GPL 2.0 as it originally was.

make CHECK_DTBS=y on bcm21664-garnet.dtb and bcm23550-sparrow.dtb
seem to pass fine for me (thanks to Stanislav Jakubek for converting
the bindings to YAML format!).

[1] https://github.com/knuxdroid/android_kernel_samsung_baffinlite

Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Renamed bcm21664-common.dtsi to bcm2166x-common.dtsi
 - Dropped model/compatible from SoC DTSIs
 - Moved apps bus peripherals in SoC DTSIs under "&apps"
 - Re-added SoC-specific compatibles into SoC DTSIs
 - Fixed warning regarding address in GIC node name
 - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240605-bcm21664-common-v1-0-6386e9141eb6@gmail.com/

---
Artur Weber (2):
      ARM: dts: broadcom: bcm21664: Move chosen node into Garnet DTS
      ARM: dts: bcm-mobile: Split out nodes used by both BCM21664 and BCM23550

 arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm21664-garnet.dts     |   4 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm21664.dtsi           | 342 ++-----------------
 .../{bcm23550.dtsi => bcm2166x-common.dtsi}        | 111 +------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm23550.dtsi           | 370 ++-------------------
 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 750 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: a38297e3fb012ddfa7ce0321a7e5a8daeb1872b6
change-id: 20240528-bcm21664-common-14064864a4a7

Best regards,
-- 
Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ