[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqkeMJ5PPETMb5d3@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:09:04 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: add missing condition check for existence of
mapped data
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 01:31:14PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 102a9fb0c65f..cdc0b25091e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -863,7 +863,8 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_prep_rq(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req)
> nvme_start_request(req);
> return BLK_STS_OK;
> out_unmap_data:
> - nvme_unmap_data(dev, req);
> + if (blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
> + nvme_unmap_data(dev, req);
This is already applied, but it is kind of strange. We get here only if
metadata mapping fails. Is there actually a command that has metadata
without data?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists